The Impact of Green Technology and Industrialization on Environmental Performance in Oil-Producing Countries: A Dynamic ARDL Approach
Abstract
This study investigates the dynamic effects of industrialization and green technology on environmental performance in 13 oil-producing countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region over the period 2005–2025. Using panel data and the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach, both short-run and long-run relationships among the variables are examined. The empirical findings confirm the existence of a long-run equilibrium relationship between the study variables. The results indicate that industrialization exerts a strong, long-term detrimental effect on environmental performance, whereas green technology has a positive but relatively weak effect. Similar patterns are observed in the short run: industrialization negatively affects environmental performance, while green technology positively affects it. In contrast, trade competitiveness, human development, and urbanization do not exhibit statistically significant effects. The error-correction term suggests that approximately 10% of short-run disequilibrium is corrected in each period, indicating a relatively slow adjustment toward long-run equilibrium. The findings imply that industrialization in oil-producing economies remains predominantly pollution-intensive due to the abundance and low cost of fossil fuels. At the same time, the limited penetration of green technologies has constrained their mitigating impact on environmental degradation. Accordingly, the study recommends adopting green industrialization policies, accelerating the transition to renewable energy, attracting environmentally friendly foreign direct investment, strengthening human capital, reforming fossil fuel subsidy systems, and enhancing regional environmental cooperation.
Keywords:
Climate change, Oil-producing countries, Industrialization, Green technology, Environmental performanceReferences
- [1] Fakher, H. A., & others. (2023). The impact of gross domestic product, financial development, energy consumption on environmental quality: With emphasis on six environmental indicators. Journal of natural environment, 76(2), 345–363. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/jf/721-285046-x-1370621.pdf
- [2] Fakher, H. A. (2022). Threshold impact of financial development on the composite environmental quality index with emphasis on the role of research and development: using multi-criteria decision makin and principal component analysis. Journal of decisions and operations research, 6(Special Issue), 1–25. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22105/dmor.2021.272043.1321
- [3] Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. In The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press. http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/sitefiles/file/Sachs%20Writing/2014/%E2%80%9CThe%20Age%20of%20Sustainable%20Development%20by%20Jeffrey%20D_%20Sachs%20-%20Project%20Syndicate%E2%80%9D.pdf
- [4] Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinner, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P. W., Trisos, C., ... & Orendain, D. J. (2023). IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01KAV2B3ZQ47W8ZHHDZ81WAMNM
- [5] Fakher, H.-A., Abedi, Z., Ahmadian, M., & Shaygani, B. (2018). Comparative examine the impact of financial development (based on money market and capital market) in the intensity of economic growth effects on the environmental performance. Environmental researches, 9(17), 133–146. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20089597.1397.9.17.17.4
- [6] Ross, M. L. (2013). The oil curse: How petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton University Press.
- [7] Zeb, K., Ali, S. M., Khan, B., Mehmood, C. A., Tareen, N., Din, W., … Haider, A. (2017). A survey on waste heat recovery: Electric power generation and potential prospects within Pakistan. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 75, 1142–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.096
- [8] Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American economic review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
- [9] Toczyłowska-Mamińska, R. (2017). Limits and perspectives of pulp and paper industry wastewater treatment--A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 78, 764–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.021
- [10] Wolf, M. J., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., Sherbinin, A. D., & Wendling, Z. A. (2022). 2022 Environmental Performance Index: ranking country performance on sustainability issues [full report]. https://bvearmb.do/handle/123456789/2830
- [11] Fakher, H. A., & Idroes, G. M. (2025). Room for improving the ecological sustainability gap in g20 economies through the lens of load capacity factor: The role of green energy initiatives as moderators. Innovations in environmental economics, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.v1i1.33
- [12] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The quarterly journal of economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w4634/w4634.pdf
- [13] Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. van der. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of economic perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
- [14] Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The academy of management review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
- [15] DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W., & others. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147–160. https://lms.academyofhrd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The_Iron_Cage_Revisted_Institutional_Isomorphism_a.pdf
- [16] Sæther, B., & Neumann, A. (2024). The effect of the 2022 energy crisis on electricity markets ashore the North Sea. Energy economics, 131, 107380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107380
- [17] Liu, Y., Liu, B., Yang, H., & Luo, K. (2025). Optimal production and maintenance strategies for manufacturing/remanufacturing leasing system considering uncertain quality and carbon emission. International journal of production economics, 280, 109489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109489
- [18] Hao, Y. (2022). Effect of economic indicators, renewable energy consumption and human development on climate change: An empirical analysis based on panel data of selected countries. Frontiers in energy research, 10, 841497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.841497
- [19] Ahmed, R. R., Akbar, W., Aijaz, M., Channar, Z. A., Ahmed, F., & Parmar, V. (2023). The role of green innovation on environmental and organizational performance: Moderation of human resource practices and management commitment. Heliyon, 9(1). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(22)03967-6.pdf
- [20] D’Adamo, I., Dell’Aguzzo, A., & Pruckner, M. (2024). Residential photovoltaic and energy storage systems for sustainable development: An economic analysis applied to incentive mechanisms. Sustainable development, 32(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2652
- [21] Xiong, L., Jing, B., Chen, M., Zheng, X., & Wu, W. (2023). Comprehensive environmental impact assessment of plastic film mulching with emphasis on waste disposal of discarded plastic film in sunflower production. Journal of cleaner production, 404, 136979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136979
- [22] Yi, M., Xu, L., Zhang, T., Ao, L., & Sun, M. (2025). The impact of foreign direct investment on green technology progress in China on two-carbon background: taking trade openness into consideration. Frontiers in environmental science, 12, 1533146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1533146
- [23] Wang, H. Y., Li, Y., Jiao, S. Q., Chou, K. C., & Zhang, G. H. (2023). Recovery of Ni matte from Ni-bearing electroplating sludge. Journal of environmental management, 326, 116744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116744
- [24] Cheng, Z., & Meng, X. (2023). Can carbon emissions trading improve corporate total factor productivity? Technological forecasting and social change, 195, 122791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122791
- [25] Cao, H. W., Pei, Q. M., Yu, X., Santosh, M., Li, G. M., Zhang, L. K., ... & Cao, A. B. (2023). Discovery of the large-scale Eocene Xiwu Pb–Zn–Ag deposit in the Tethyan Himalaya: Geochronology, geochemistry, and C–H–O–S–Pb–Sr–Nd isotopes. Gondwana research, 124, 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.07.001
- [26] Appiah-Twum, F., & Long, X. (2023). Human capital, trade competitiveness and environmental efficiency convergence across Asia Pacific countries. Environmental and resource economics, 85(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00758-6
- [27] Niromand, M., Ahmadzadeh, S., & Bahrami, Z. (2025). Investigating the effect of environmental orientation on sustainable performance with the mediating role of green supply chain management and green innovation and the moderating role of institutional pressure. Research in production and operations management, 16(1), 25–48. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22108/pom.2025.143545.1600
- [28] HeydriA Aineh, Z., Abedin, S. Z. Al, & Majid, J. S. A. (2025). Investigating the effect of production aggregation on the green economic efficiency of industrial workshops with ten or more employees. Quarterly journal of industrial economics research, 8(29), 20–38. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30473/jier.2025.73645.1490
- [29] Fathia, M. R., Mokariana, P., & Ghadimib, H. (2024). Investigating the impact of corporate social responsibility on environmental performance with emphasis on the mediating role of green transformational leadership and green capability. Journal of industrial innovations, 2(4), 424–435. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.61882/jii.2.4.424
