From Safety to Sustainability: A Bibliometric Perspective on Technological Transformation in Agricultural Systems

Authors

  • Ghazi Mauer Idroes * Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Abulyatama, Aceh Besar, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6217-9067
  • Mussa Isaack Delya Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI) - Kihinga Center, Kigoma P.O. Box 132, Tanzania.
  • Erick Hironimus Kihwili Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI) - Tumbi, Tabora, P.O. Box 306, Tanzania.
  • Mhd. Hidayattullah Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Abulyatama, Aceh Besar, Indonesia.
  • Taufiq Karma Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Abulyatama, Aceh Besar, Indonesia.
  • Wildan Seni Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Abulyatama, Aceh Besar, Indonesia.
  • Zahriah Zahriah Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia.

https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.v2i1.69

Abstract

Agricultural systems are undergoing rapid transformation driven by technological innovation, environmental pressures, and increasing demands for sustainable production. However, the integration of worker safety within sustainability-oriented agricultural transitions remains insufficiently understood. This study aims to systematically map the scientific landscape of research related to occupational health and safety, technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in agricultural and agroindustrial systems using a bibliometric approach. Bibliographic data were collected from the Scopus database, resulting in 98 peer-reviewed articles published between 1981 and 2026. Bibliometric and network analyses were conducted using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny to identify publication trends, influential contributors, collaborative structures, thematic evolution, and emerging research directions. The findings reveal a substantial increase in research activity after 2016, reflecting growing scientific attention toward integrating worker protection with sustainable agricultural transformation. The field's intellectual structure is dominated by interconnected themes, including risk assessment, ergonomics, climate-related exposure, mechanization, digital agriculture, artificial intelligence, wearable technologies, and environmental management. Thematic evolution analysis indicates a shift from conventional safety concerns to technology-driven, predictive approaches to agricultural risk management. The study also demonstrates that technological advancement simultaneously creates opportunities for improved efficiency and environmental monitoring while introducing new occupational risks and governance challenges. Although research productivity remains concentrated in developed economies, global collaboration is gradually expanding. Overall, the study highlights that future agricultural sustainability depends not only on environmental and technological performance but also on the creation of safe, inclusive, and socially resilient working systems.

Keywords:

Precision governance, Climate resilience, Smart farming, Socio-technical systems, Labor vulnerability

References

  1. [1] Sahoo, G., Wani, A. M., Swamy, S. L., Roul, P. K., Dash, A. C., & Sharma, A. (2022). Livelihood Strategy and Sustainability Aspects in Industrialization as a Source of Employment in Rural Areas. In Social morphology, human welfare, and sustainability (pp. 643–670). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96760-4_26

  2. [2] Zakshevsky, V. G., Charykova, O. G., & Merenkova, I. N. (2019). Strategic priorities for developing the agro-industrial complex and rural areas of the region. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, 274(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/274/1/012007

  3. [3] Ingrao, C., Strippoli, R., Lagioia, G., & Huisingh, D. (2023). Water scarcity in agriculture: An overview of causes, impacts and approaches for reducing the risks. Heliyon, 9(8), e18507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18507

  4. [4] Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., Adams, H., Adler, C., Aldunce, P., Ali, E., … & Biesbroek, R. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGII_SummaryVolume.pdf

  5. [5] Benos, L., & Bochtis, D. D. (2021). An Analysis of Safety and Health Issues in Agriculture Towards Work Automation (pp. 95–117). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84156-0_5

  6. [6] Pilarczyk, M., & Ulewicz, R. (2023). Evaluating Occupational Hazards and Prevention Strategies in Agriculture: Case Study. System safety: human-technical facility-environment, 5(1), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2023-0023

  7. [7] Fazli, Q. S., Idroes, G. M., Hilal, I. S., Hafizah, I., Hardi, I., & Noviandy, T. R. (2025). Agrochemicals, GHG emissions, and GDP in southeast Asia: A machine learning approach with hierarchical clustering. Grimsa journal of business and economics studies, 2(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.61975/gjbes.v2i2.93

  8. [8] Meynard, J. M., Jeuffroy, M. H., Le Bail, M., Lefèvre, A., Magrini, M. B., & Michon, C. (2017). Designing coupled innovations for the sustainability transition of agrifood systems. Agricultural systems, 157, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.08.002

  9. [9] Yatsenko, О., Zavadska, Y., Khrystenko, O., Musiiets, T., & Aksyonova, O. (2021). Innovative transformations of the agricultural complex in the context of global challenges of sustainable development. Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice, 5(40), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v5i40.244989

  10. [10] Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS: Wageningen journal of life sciences, 90–91(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315

  11. [11] Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C.-A. (2021). Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet. Land use policy, 100, 104933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933

  12. [12] Djapan, M., Macuzic, I., Tadic, D., & Baldissone, G. (2019). An innovative prognostic risk assessment tool for manufacturing sector based on the management of the human, organizational and technical/technological factors. Safety science, 119, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.032

  13. [13] Chis, T. V., Cioca, L. I., Badea, D. O., Cristea, I., Darabont, D. C., Iordache, R. M., ... & Barsan, V. A. (2025). Integrated noise management strategies in industrial environments: a framework for occupational safety, health, and productivity. Sustainability, 17(3), 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031181

  14. [14] Jilcha, K., & Kitaw, D. (2017). Industrial occupational safety and health innovation for sustainable development. Engineering science and technology, an international journal, 20(1), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.10.011

  15. [15] Yang, Z., & Solangi, Y. A. (2024). Analyzing the relationship between natural resource management, environmental protection, and agricultural economics for sustainable development in China. Journal of cleaner production, 450, 141862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141862

  16. [16] Abdrakhmanov, N., Fedosov, A., Kilinbaeva, I., Ismagilov, M., & Savicheva, Y. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between the sustainable environmental health and occupational safety: problems, prospects and opportunities. IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science, 981(3), 032046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/981/3/032046

  17. [17] Fielke, S., Bronson, K., Carolan, M., Eastwood, C., Higgins, V., Jakku, E., … & Wolf, S. A. (2022). A call to expand disciplinary boundaries so that social scientific imagination and practice are central to quests for ‘responsible’ digital agri‐food innovation. Sociologia ruralis, 62(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12376

  18. [18] El Bilali, H. (2019). Research on agro-food sustainability transitions: A systematic review of research themes and an analysis of research gaps. Journal of cleaner production, 221, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.232

  19. [19] El Bilali, H. (2019). The multi-level perspective in research on sustainability transitions in agriculture and food systems: A systematic review. Agriculture, 9(4), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9040074

  20. [20] Roy, T., & George K, J. (2020). Precision Farming: A Step Towards Sustainable, Climate-Smart Agriculture. In Global climate change: resilient and smart agriculture (pp. 199–220). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9856-9_10

  21. [21] Vishnoi, S., & Goel, R. K. (2024). Climate smart agriculture for sustainable productivity and healthy landscapes. Environmental science & policy, 151, 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103600

  22. [22] Lee, C. L., Orton, G., & Lu, P. (2024). Global meta-analysis of innovation attributes influencing climate-smart agriculture adoption for sustainable development. Climate, 12(11), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12110192

  23. [23] Getahun, S., Kefale, H., & Gelaye, Y. (2024). Application of precision agriculture technologies for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability: A systematic review. The scientific world journal, 2024(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2126734

  24. [24] Molina-Guzmán, L. P., & Ríos-Osorio, L. A. (2020). Occupational health and safety in agriculture. A systematic review. Revista de la facultad de medicina, 68(4), 625–638. http://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n4.76519

  25. [25] Fazli, Q. S., Noviandy, T. R., Idroes, G. M., & Idroes, G. M. (2025). Research landscape on occupational hazards and pesticide exposure among agricultural workers: A bibliometric analysis. Narra review, 1(3), e13. http://doi.org/10.52225/narrarev.v1i3.13

  26. [26] Nawaz, W., Linke, P., & Koҫ, M. (2019). Safety and sustainability nexus: A review and appraisal. Journal of cleaner production, 216, 74–87. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.167

  27. [27] Al-Emran, M. (2023). Beyond technology acceptance: Development and evaluation of technology-environmental, economic, and social sustainability theory. Technology in society, 75, 102383. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102383

  28. [28] Vrchota, J., Pech, M., Rolínek, L., & Bednář, J. (2020). Sustainability outcomes of green processes in relation to industry 4.0 in manufacturing: systematic review. Sustainability, 12(15), 5968. http://doi.org/10.3390/su12155968

  29. [29] Idroes, G. M., Fakher, H. A., Hilal, I. S., & Wiranatakusuma, D. B. (2026). N-shaped or inverted N-Shaped EKC? The role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environmental sustainability. Ekonomikalia journal of economics, 4(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v4i1.400

  30. [30] Idroes, G. M., Hilal, I. S., Hafizah, I., Hamaguchi, Y., Bruyn, C. de, Agustina, M., … & Stancu, S. (2025). Do Natural Disasters, Fossil Fuels, and Renewable Energy Affect CO2 Emissions and the Ecological Footprint? Ekonomikalia journal of economics, 3(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v3i1.285

  31. [31] Nagarajan, C. D., Afjal, M., & Idroes, G. M. (2025). Distinct impacts of frugality on the intention to embrace energy-efficient and energy-generating products. International journal of energy sector management, 19(3), 710–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2024-0001

  32. [32] Fakher, H. A., & Idroes, G. M. (2025). Room for improving the ecological sustainability gap in g20 economies through the lens of load capacity factor: The role of green energy initiatives as moderators. Innovations in environmental economics, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.v1i1.33

  33. [33] Idroes, G. M., Hafizah, I., Hartono, D., Dharma, D. B., Hardi, I., Noviandy, T. R., & Idroes, R. (2025). Investigating hydropower energy consumption’s effect on Southeast Asia’s path to achieving environmental sustainability and carbon neutrality. Carbon research, 4(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-025-00218-4

  34. [34] Idroes, G. M., Syahnur, S., Majid, S. A., Sasmita, N. R., & Idroes, R. (2021). Provincial economic level analysis in Indonesia based on the geothermal energy potential and growth regional domestic products using cluster analysis. IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering, 1087(1), 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1087/1/012079

  35. [35] Noviandy, T. R., Idroes, G. M., & Hardi, I. (2024). An interpretable machine learning strategy for antimalarial drug discovery with LightGBM and SHAP. Journal of future artificial intelligence and technologies, 1(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.62411/faith.2024-16

  36. [36] Fazli, Q. S., Azis, H., Delya, M. I., Kihwili, E. H., Idroes, G. M., & Idroes, G. M. (2026). From control to coexistence: Reframing integrated pest management under climate and environmental change. Leuser journal of environmental studies, 4(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.60084/ljes.v4i1.409

  37. [37] Fazli, Q. S., Hardi, I., Hilal, I. S., & Idroes, G. M. (2026). System-level integration of hydrogen economy and circular economy: A bibliometric analysis of techno-economic and infrastructure-oriented research. Hydrogen economy & engineering, 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hee.2026.100003

  38. [38] Fazli, Q. S., Delya, M. I., Kihwili, E. H., Idroes, G. M., Wiranatakusuma, D. B., & Idroes, G. M. (2026). When safety meets the economy: mapping fifty years of research on agricultural labor, occupational health, and economic outcomes. Grimsa journal of business and economics studies, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.61975/gjbes.v3i2.111

  39. [39] Salim Fazli, Q., Isaack Delya, M., Hironimus Kihwili, E., Qashmal, M., Shabrina Hilal, I., & Idroes, G. M. (2025). How is research connecting artificial intelligence, sustainability governance, and agri-food supply chains evolving? A bibliometric analysis. Indatu journal of management and accounting, 3(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.60084/ijma.v3i2.368

  40. [40] Fazli, Q. S., Lorente, D. B., Hilal, I. S., Maulidar, P., & Idroes, G. M. (2025). Mapping global research on agrochemicals and sustainability: a bibliometric analysis of environmental and economic perspectives. Innovations in environmental economics, 1(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.v1i2.44

  41. [41] Fazli, Q. S., Delya, M. I., Almuchty, M. A., Hafizah, I., & Wiranatakusuma, D. B. (2025). Mapping the evolution of agricultural economics: A bibliometric analysis of the nexus between economic growth, environmental sustainability, and econometric modeling. Ekonomikalia journal of economics, 3(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v3i2.345

  42. [42] Agustina, M., Thahira, Z., Zikra, N., Amalina, F., Afjal, M., & Idroes, G. M. (2025). General equilibrium model applications in energy research: A bibliometric analysis. Ekonomikalia journal of economics, 3(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v3i1.291

  43. [43] Bhardwaj, M., Kumar, P., & Singh, A. (2025). Bibliometric review of digital transformation in agriculture: innovations, trends and sustainable futures. Journal of agribusiness in developing and emerging economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/jadee-02-2025-0083

  44. [44] Gherțescu, C., Manta, A. G., & Bădîrcea, R. M. (2025). Smart agriculture and technological innovation: A bibliometric perspective on digital transformation and sustainability. Agriculture, 15(13), 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15131388

  45. [45] Xu, J., Li, Y., Zhang, M., & Zhang, S. (2024). Sustainable agriculture in the digital era: Past, present, and future trends by bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 10(14), e34612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34612

  46. [46] Sorensen, G., Dennerlein, J. T., Peters, S. E., Sabbath, E. L., Kelly, E. L., & Wagner, G. R. (2021). The future of research on work, safety, health and wellbeing: A guiding conceptual framework. Social science & medicine, 269, 113593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113593

  47. [47] Iavicoli, I., Leso, V., Beezhold, D. H., & Shvedova, A. A. (2017). Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 329, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2017.05.025

  48. [48] Fathallah, F. A. (2010). Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture. Applied ergonomics, 41(6), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.003

  49. [49] Damalas, C. A., & Abdollahzadeh, G. (2016). Farmers’ use of personal protective equipment during handling of plant protection products: Determinants of implementation. Science of the total environment, 571, 730–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.042

  50. [50] Sassenrath, G. F., Heilman, P., Luschei, E., Bennett, G. L., Fitzgerald, G., Klesius, P., … & Zimba, P. V. (2008). Technology, complexity and change in agricultural production systems. Renewable agriculture and food systems, 23(4), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217050700213X

  51. [51] Souza, A., Watanabe, M. D. B., Cavalett, O., Ugaya, C. M. L., & Bonomi, A. (2018). Social life cycle assessment of first and second-generation ethanol production technologies in Brazil. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 23(3), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1112-y

  52. [52] Hejazi, R. F., Husain, T., & Khan, F. I. (2003). Landfarming operation of oily sludge in arid region—human health risk assessment. Journal of hazardous materials, 99(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00062-1

  53. [53] Dumont, A. M., & Baret, P. V. (2017). Why working conditions are a key issue of sustainability in agriculture? A comparison between agroecological, organic and conventional vegetable systems. Journal of rural studies, 56, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.007

  54. [54] O’Neill, D. . (2000). Ergonomics in industrially developing countries: does its application differ from that in industrially advanced countries? Applied ergonomics, 31(6), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00033-8

  55. [55] Boverhof, D. R., Ladics, G., Luebke, B., Botham, J., Corsini, E., Evans, E., … & Yang, Y. (2014). Approaches and considerations for the assessment of immunotoxicity for environmental chemicals: A workshop summary. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 68(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.012

  56. [56] Yu, E. A., Akormedi, M., Asampong, E., Meyer, C. G., & Fobil, J. N. (2017). Informal processing of electronic waste at Agbogbloshie, Ghana: workers’ knowledge about associated health hazards and alternative livelihoods. Global health promotion, 24(4), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.012

  57. [57] Chari, R., Chang, C. C., Sauter, S. L., Sayers, E. L. P., Cerully, J. L., Schulte, P., ... & Uscher-Pines, L. (2018). Expanding the paradigm of occupational safety and health: a new framework for worker well-being. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 60(7), 589-593. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001330

  58. [58] Ansah, E. W., Ankomah-Appiah, E., Amoadu, M., & Sarfo, J. O. (2021). Climate change, health and safety of workers in developing economies: A scoping review. The journal of climate change and health, 3, 100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100034

  59. [59] D, C. S., & Devarajan, Y. (2025). Investigation of emerging technologies in agriculture: An in-depth look at smart farming, nano-agriculture, AI, and Big Data. Journal of biosystems engineering, 50(2), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-025-00258-z

  60. [60] Ashique, S., Raikar, A., Jamil, S., Lakshminarayana, L., Gajbhiye, S. A., De, S., & Kumar, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence integration with nanotechnology: a new frontier for sustainable and precision agriculture. Current nanoscience, 21(2), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734137275111231206072049

  61. [61] Tantalaki, N., Souravlas, S., & Roumeliotis, M. (2019). Data-driven decision making in precision agriculture: The rise of big data in agricultural systems. Journal of agricultural & food information, 20(4), 344–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2019.1638264

  62. [62] Aiello, G., Catania, P., Vallone, M., & Venticinque, M. (2022). Worker safety in agriculture 4.0: A new approach for mapping operator’s vibration risk through Machine Learning activity recognition. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 193, 106637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106637

  63. [63] Ahmad, B., Alam, A., Hamid, A., Hamza, M. A., Abbas, K., Ji, Y., … & Chen, R. (2026). Modern tools for sustainable agriculture: a review of intelligent crop protection technologies. Discover agriculture, 4(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00467-2

  64. [64] Losch, B. (2022). Decent employment and the future of agriculture. How dominant narratives prevent addressing structural issues. Frontiers in sustainable food systems, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.862249

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

From Safety to Sustainability: A Bibliometric Perspective on Technological Transformation in Agricultural Systems. (2026). Innovations in Environmental Economics , 2(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.v2i1.69

Similar Articles

1-10 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.